Harry Potter and the Urdu ‘Heh’

Hrm. I thought I had my font issues sorted out, but perhaps not. I’ve added another web-font that should take care of most fall-back situations, but do let me know if things don’t seem to be displaying properly!

As I was adding Books II-IV to The List, I noticed something odd about the Urdu titles and references to them online.

What I have always had for “Harry Potter” is 1 below, but what I was seeing online was 2 (don’t forget Arabic script reads right-to-left so the first character is the right-most:

  1. هیرى پوٹر
  2. ہیری پوٹر

Of course, the book itself is on the shelf, so surely that would resolve it. The cover of the Urdu Philosopher’s Stone is:

Sure enough, matches 1. But wait! Always check the title page too…

It’s 2. So what gives? It’s pretty clearly not just the same character presented differently because of a font—it’s a different character, unicode points at all.

What about other titles in Arabic script?

  • ARB: هاري بوتر
  • FAS: هری پاتر
  • UIG: خاررى پوتتېر

Well the Uighur isn’t much help. But Arabic and Farsi both use the same initial letter as 1.

Consulting Urdu Alphabet on Wikipedia:

He is divided into two variants: choṭī he (“little ye”) and do-cashmī he (“two-eyed ye”).
Choṭī he (ہ‎) is written zigzagged. It can only be used as in Persian.
Do-cashmī he (ھ‎) is written in all forms exactly as in Arabic Naskh style (as a loop), in order to create the aspirate consonants.

It’s starting to make more sense—let me unpack that! First, the character being used at the beginning of 1 is “Do-cashmī he” (ھ‎) and it looks more or less the same. The first character of 2, however, is “Choṭī he” (ہ‎)—it looks nothing like 2, because, as Arabic characters are wont to do, it takes a completely different form depending on it’s position in the word. Word initially, it looks like this: ہـ‎, ie. how it looks at the beginning of 2.

Both characters are transliterated into the Latin alphabet as “h” but “Choṭī he” does not occur in Arabic and “Do-cashmī he” is used for a very different purpose than in Arabic—rather than indicating a consonant in and of itself, it is added to other consonants to represent consonants in Urdu that don’t exist in Arabic. We do exactly the same thing when we transliterate Urdu. There are quite a few consonants in Urdu that do not exist in English that we represent by adding an ‘h’: bh /bʱ/, ph /pʰ/, th /t̪ʰ/ etc. So, “Choṭi he” is used for the actual /h/ consonant and “Do-cashmī he” is used only in this specialized way to indicate aspirated consonants.

That gives us an answer!

ہیری پوٹر

2 is the correct spelling of “Harry Potter” in Urdu.

But the cover you say! Indeed, that’s the mystery isn’t it… until it dawned on me that the cover uses a very stylized Harry Potter font. One that was very likely created for Arabic and very likely didn’t include “Choṭī he”. Given a font deficiency and possibly an unwillingness to expend the resources to fix the font, they probably just used the “Do-cashmī he” as the best approximation (not coincidentally, the same character used by Arabic).

I ran this theory past a native speaker and they confirmed that:

  • 2 is definitely the correct “Harry Potter”
  • The covers are definitely weird, but comprehensible to Urdu speakers
  • The font-deficiency theory is a reasonably likely to be the cause of the difference

The non-cover spellings are also supported by the Urdu Harry Potter Wikipedia page which uses the “Choṭī he” (although, be careful! That page appears to have a GOF typo in the last word!)

There are two more places in the titles where these two “he” are relevant. One is the last character of COS and the other is the last character in GOF:

  • 2. ہیری پوٹر اور رازوں کا کمرہ
  • 4. ہیری پوٹر اور آگ کا پِیالہ

For COS, it actually doesn’t matter because the character would be rendered the same regardless. It makes a big difference for GOF and interestingly the cover art sticks with the Arabic character instead. So even if they aren’t being consistent with the language, at least they are maintaining consistency with the cover art!

So! Given that Harry Potter in Translation has (until now) always had the incorrect titles, most of us collectors have likely been using the incorrect titles too. Update your lists everyone!

You may also like...

1 response

  1. Carly says:

    Super interesting! I had noticed that initially when I got my Urdu PS copy, but then forgot all about it. Thanks!!!!!

Leave a Reply